10.0 KB · ⇊ 7 parts · ⤓ Micron 10.0 KB · ⤓ HTML 50.4 KB

top

The classical electron radius is a combination of fundamental physical quantities that define a length scale for problems involving an electron interacting with electromagnetic radiation. It links the classical electrostatic self-interaction energy of a homogeneous charge distribution to the electron's rest mass energy. According to modern understanding, the electron has no internal structure, and hence no size attributable to it. Nevertheless, it is useful to define a length that characterizes electron interactions in atomic-scale problems. The CODATA value for the classical electron radius iscite-ref-physconst-re-1-0[1]

r e = 1 4 π π ε ε 0 e 2 m e c 2 = {\displaystyle r_{\text{e}}={\frac {1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}}{\frac {e^{2}}{m_{\text{e}}c^{2}}}=} 2.8179403205(13)×10−15 m

where e {\displaystyle e} is the elementary charge, m e {\displaystyle m_{\text{e}}} is the electron mass, c {\displaystyle c} is the speed of light, and ε ε 0 {\displaystyle \varepsilon _{0}} is the permittivity of free space.cite-ref-2[2] This is about three times larger than the charge radius of the proton.

The classical electron radius is sometimes known as the Lorentz radius or the Thomson scattering length. It is one of a trio of related scales of length, the other two being the Bohr radius a 0 {\displaystyle a_{0}} and the reduced Compton wavelength of the electron ⁠ λ λ ¯ ¯ {\displaystyle \lambda \!\!\!{\bar {}}} ⁠. Any one of these three length scales can be written in terms of any other using the fine-structure constant α α {\displaystyle \alpha } :

r e = λ λ ¯ ¯ α α = a 0 α α 2 . {\displaystyle r_{\text{e}}=\lambda \!\!\!{\bar {}}\alpha =a_{0}\alpha ^{2}.}

• Derivation

• Discussion

• See also

• References

• Further reading

• External links

The classical electron radius length scale can be motivated by considering the energy necessary to assemble an amount of charge q {\displaystyle q} into a sphere of a given radius ⁠ r {\displaystyle r} ⁠.cite-ref-3[3] The electrostatic potential at a distance r {\displaystyle r} from a charge q {\displaystyle q} is

V ( r ) = 1 4 π π ε ε 0 q r . {\displaystyle V(r)={\frac {1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}}{\frac {q}{r}}.}

To bring an additional amount of charge d q {\displaystyle dq} from infinity adds energy ⁠ d U {\displaystyle dU} ⁠ to the system:

d U = V ( r ) d q . {\displaystyle dU=V(r)dq.}

If the sphere is assumed to have constant charge density, ⁠ ρ ρ {\displaystyle \rho } ⁠, then

q = ρ ρ 4 3 π π r 3 {\displaystyle q=\rho {\frac {4}{3}}\pi r^{3}} and d q = ρ ρ 4 π π r 2 d r . {\displaystyle dq=\rho 4\pi r^{2}dr.}

Integrating ⁠ d U {\displaystyle dU} ⁠ for r {\displaystyle r} from zero to a final radius r ′ {\displaystyle r'} yields the expression for the total energy ⁠ U {\displaystyle U} ⁠, necessary to assemble the total charge q ′ {\displaystyle q'} uniformly into a sphere of radius ⁠ r ′ {\displaystyle r'} ⁠:

U = 3 5 1 4 π π ε ε 0 q ′ 2 r ′ . {\displaystyle U={\frac {3}{5}}{\frac {1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}}{\frac {q'^{2}}{r'}}.}

This is called the electrostatic self-energy of the object. Interpreting the charge q ′ {\displaystyle q'} as the electron charge, ⁠ − − e {\displaystyle -e} ⁠, and equating the total energy U {\displaystyle U} with the energy-equivalent of the electron's rest mass, ⁠ m e c 2 {\displaystyle m_{\text{e}}c^{2}} ⁠, and solving for ⁠ r ′ {\displaystyle r'} ⁠:

r ′ = 3 5 1 4 π π ε ε 0 e 2 m e c 2 . {\displaystyle r'={\frac {3}{5}}{\frac {1}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}}}{\frac {e^{2}}{m_{\text{e}}c^{2}}}.}

The numerical factor 3/5 is ignored as being specific to the special case of a uniform charge density (e.g., for a charged spherical surface, this factor is 1/2). The resulting radius r ′ {\displaystyle r'} adjusted to ignore this factor is then defined to be the classical electron radius, ⁠ r e {\displaystyle r_{\text{e}}} ⁠, and one arrives at the expression given above.

Note that this derivation does not say that r e {\displaystyle r_{\text{e}}} is an indication of the actual radius of an electron. It only establishes a link between electrostatic self-energy and the energy-equivalent of the rest mass of the electron, and neglects the energy in the magnetic dipole field of an electron, which if considered, leads to a substantially larger calculated radius.

The classical electron radius appears in the classical limit of modern theories as well, including non-relativistic Thomson scattering and the relativistic Klein–Nishina formula. Also, r e {\displaystyle r_{\text{e}}} is roughly the length scale at which renormalization becomes important in quantum electrodynamics. That is, at short-enough distances, quantum fluctuations within the vacuum of space surrounding an electron begin to have calculable effects that have measurable consequences in atomic and particle physics.

Based on the assumption of a simple mechanical model, attempts to model the electron as a non-point particle have been described by some as ill-conceived and counter-pedagogic.cite-ref-curtis74-4-0[4]

• Electromagnetic mass

cite-note-physconst-re-11. ↑ "2022 CODATA Value: classical electron radius". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST. May 2024. Retrieved 2024-05-18.

cite-note-22. ↑ citerefd-j-griffiths1995D. J. Griffiths (1995), Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Prentice-Hall, p. 155, ISBN 0-13-124405-1

cite-note-33. ↑ citerefyoung2004Young, Hugh (2004). University Physics, 11th Ed. Addison Wesley. p. 873. ISBN 0-8053-8684-X.

cite-note-curtis74-44. ↑ citerefcurtis2003Curtis, L.J. (2003). Atomic Structure and Lifetimes: A Conceptual Approach. Cambridge University Press. p. 74. ISBN 0-521-53635-9.

• citerefarthur-n-cox1999Arthur N. Cox, ed. (1999), Allen's Astrophysical Quantities (4th ed.), Springer

• Length Scales in Physics: the Classical Electron Radius